Nested Nature of Institutional Context: Distinguishing General Institutional Constraints and Specific Legal Restraints

Mohammad Hosseini (HEC Paris)
Bertrand Quelin (HEC Paris)

Abstract : Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are promising strategic solutions in filling the infrastructure gap. We disentangle two investment decisions: entry decision and entry mode decision. We also make a distinction between different levels of institutional environment: political structure and specific legal rules. In this paper, we focus on demand risk allocation in PPPs as a critical entry mode decision. We also study the effects of a stand-alone PPP law and institutional constraints on the government, as two different levels of institutional context, on risk allocation. Our findings suggest that PPP law is negatively associated with the propensity of transferring demand risk to private partners. Moreover, we show that not only are institutional constraints positively related to risk transfer, but they also moderate the relationship between PPP law and demand risk distribution.


The Cost of Being Foreign: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Experiment in the Us

Pedro Makhoul (UCLA)
Joao V. Guedes-Neto (University of Pittsburgh)
Aldo Musacchio (Brandeis University)

Abstract : We conduct a conjoint experiment with a nationally representative sample of 3,010 US residents to assess their opinions on the acquisition of domestic companies by foreign firms. On average, US residents are 16 percentage points less likely to support a foreign firm as the preferred acquirer to an American company, compared to an identical domestic firm. We also show that there is a tension between nationalistic preferences and economic incentives. Still, it is quite hard for foreign firms to overcome their disadvantage by offering more favorable deal conditions. Additionally, we demonstrate that liability of foreignness (LOF) is considerably more complex than previously theorized by showing that LOF is not only a firm-level phenomenon, but also runs at the ownership level. Finally, we argue that both practitioners and strategy and IB scholars should pay more attention to the effects of public opinion, as understanding how the local population feel about foreign acquisitions can be quite important to managers when planning their international expansions and when entering negotiations to acquire a foreign company.